|The Integrated Drawing in 3D CAD|
There are a few 3D CAD functions that are not readily available with a Pro/e
Clone. These are so productive that each one alone can increase your
productivity by 2X. When you combine them it moves to 5x, with changes
it can increase to 10x.
When you combine them it moves to 5x, with changes it can increase to 10x.
There are basically Three. Which the article topic is last.
The Single Model Environment (No Assembly Mode)
(No Assembly Mode)
This is by far the most productive 3D system environment feature. Only a few systems have this. You design in-context or top down by system design. It is the only design process you use. I was talking to a very experience Solidworks user and engineer. I was discussing the weakness of bottom up design, being done by so many Solidwork’s users. He said he designed that way. Well, I sold him a seat of ZW3D. I showed him he didn't have to do PDM in the conceptual phase of the project. He saw that he could do the all of the parts (assembly) design and the integrated drawing in one file as a complete project.
Integrated History/Direct Edit
This is the next required functionality. There is no substitute. The need to do extensive design intent before starting a part is wasting a huge amount of design time. If you don’t do it (which is the sign of an inexperienced user), it will put you in a corner every time. Imagine just start designing your part, knowing you can just keep on designing no matter what design problem you run into. There is even more productivity by adding Hybrid 3D CAD modeling. This closes the door on any limitation by having all of the design processes available: 2D/3D wireframe, free form surfacing and history/direct edit solid modeling.s 3D CAD Productivity an Oxymoron?
Now to the Integrated Drawing
There is no place where the integrated drawing is not a more productive feature!
I have always had the integrated drawing available. First in CADKEY and now in ZW3D. Just think of the convenience of having the drawing in the part file. You just look to see if there is a drawing in the same file.
Most engineering is done in small project or assemblies. With these features you do the complete design in one file.
It is quite bizarre with those programs that have separate drawings that they don’t even have a link to the drawing file from the part or assembly file. How would a new user know it even exists without knowing it exists.
So what does the integrated drawing solve?
Well, PLM would probably not have needed to be created. I know for sure we would not need MBE/MBD and the PMI. While this is probably marginally handled with a small companying. Building large assemblies like Airplanes it is totally unmanageable or not cost effective. It opens the door to Murphy on so many levels.
So, look at your own PDM and see the mess. Look how much it is costing you. Do you need a staff of IT folks just to maintain your engineering documentation? I using Creo (Pro/e), Catia, NX, Solidworks, Inventor generating massive data.
The part file
The assembly file
Then think of all the parts that are interrelated.
The biggest advantage and the biggest weakness of the Pro/e clone is the associativity.
This promise alone has not delivered and caused chaos in document control
This is a no brainer for individual designers doing single projects.
Even in large manufacturing companies many single projects are given to engineers.
If you have concurrent projects where you have multiple designers working on an assembly. The documentation (drawing) being integrated is a just another file that doesn’t need to be maintained.
So, let’s see how this works.
Here is our assembly. Now notice this is in a single file.
We will open the bearing.
Then put the curser in the workspace and push the right mouse button and a menu will show up and we will select 2D sheet.
Now, I have already created this sheet. But it is no different than what you are already using except it is integrated into the part or assembly.
We can also do it with the assembly. Here are a couple of sheets defining the assembly. Notice all the sheets are in the same file defined by tabs on the bottom.
We could have all the parts documented in the same file. Imagine only having “ONE” file to maintain. Even if you did do associated part in a separate assembly the drawing would be integrated with the part file.
Nothing could be easier.
The lack of this feature has caused the industry to develop the MBE/MBD process with the minimized PMI which is nothing but a Band-Aid devised by those that have no applicable experience or knowledge of the requirements of engineering documentation.
They are trying to use the native file as the engineering deliverable. Which is impossible.
So, let’s look at this solution and realize the incredible cost advantage on so many levels.
If your engineering deliverable is the model and a drawing as a PDF, nothing really changes. Anytime you move to a new 3D CAD system you need to keep the old system, more than likely forever. I am sure there are many companies that still have their AutoCAD available.
Now if you are large company and your engineering department is under the control of the PLM gurus and they have implement the unworkable MBE/MBD based on the PMI. You will have to go through a paradigm shift of “Back to the Past”. I really do not thing that the large companies have the applicable knowledge to make this happen.
They have to put the engineering department back
in the hands of engineering. While there would be part/assembly
management in the native system, it would only be accessed by those trained
While there would be part/assembly management in the native system, it would only be accessed by those trained
The solution we suggest is ZW3D
Try this concept today. Download ZW3D and import an assembly as a native or neutral format. It comes into one file. You can then edit the parts with robust history/direct edit modeling. Then just create the drawing with feature rich documentation functionality.
The cost savings can not be overlooked!
It has all the above benefits and superior performance to the top programs.
But ZW3D’s claim to fame is the cost.
It offers two levels of design
ZW3D Lite $1300.00/Annual Rental $350.00
$1300.00/Annual Rental $350.00
ZW3D Standard $2500.00/Annual Rental $625.00
$2500.00/Annual Rental $625.00
suggest you always have at least one current perpetual seat.
suggest you always have at least one current perpetual seat.
ZW3D comes with translators that can read all the popular programs. I can read the PMI from Creo, Catia, NX and Solidworks for those companies that are trapped in the MBE process.
ZW3D is an obvious solution to bring the 3D CAD world out of chaos.